New Manufacturing "Start Me Up" Book Explains How To Start Your Own Business
Powered by MaxBlogPress  

Archive for the ‘Nutjobs’ Category

KGB Demoralizing

Friday, February 12th, 2010

By Toby Moreland

The Soviet Union was a front for the alliance between international bankers and the British Empire. Marxist-Leninist ideology is illegitimate to the core; it is a tool used in the process of “ideological subversion,” a method of weakening independent nations and ultimately turning them into socialist “democracies” under internationalist control.”

In a 1980’s interview with G. Edward Griffin, Yuri Bezmenov, KGB defector and expert in propaganda, said the subversion methods employed in the U.S. by the KGB were designed to “change the perception of reality of every American to such an extent that – despite the abundance of information – no one is able to come to sensible conclusions in the interest of defending themselves, their families, their community, and their country.”

This multi-stage process requires media complicity/mediocrity, control of educational policy, widespread corruption in politics and industry, and the unlimited money/credit of the international bankers who funded and controlled the USSR.

Scrupulous and influential opponents are discredited, threatened or murdered. It goes very slowly, and its purpose is to eventually bring the target nation to total collapse, when efficient shifts of power structure and economy can take place.

It is important to understand that the goal of ideological subversion is NOT to convert everyone to the left. Leftist ideology must only be presented as a legitimate alternative for the subversion to be successful. The Hegelian dialectic does the rest, and when the economic structure deteriorates within the target nation, the subverted population – divided, dumbed down, short-sighted and reactive – will beg for the expansion of government programs.

According to Bezmenov, the first stage of this process – demoralization – usually takes 15 to 20 years because this is the amount of time it takes to educate a single generation of students. In the United States, the super-patsy, this process has continued uninterrupted for at least 50 years. It has been applied in any area of society where public opinion is formulated.

Bezmenov said that about 80-85% of the KGB’s resources, money, and manpower went toward this subversion process. They recruited journalists, filmmakers, actors, musicians, activists, etc. He said many KGB agents were exchange students.

Here are a few examples of application from Bezmenov’s lecture in Los Angeles in 1983:

Religion – “Destroy it. Ridicule it. Replace it with various sex cults which bring people’s attention, faith – whether it is naive or primitive – it doesn’t really matter. As long as the basically accepted religious dogma is slowly eroded and people are divorced from the Supreme Being. Replace accepted, respected religious organizations with fake organizations. Distract people’s attention from the real faith, and attract them to various different faiths.” (without any unifying philosophy, important discussions are held exclusively in the realm of humanistic materialism, which clearly favors the central bankers and is always subject to change at their whim.)

Education – “Distract them from learning something which is constructive, pragmatic, efficient. Instead of mathematics, physics, foreign languages, chemistry…teach them history of urban warfare, natural foods, home economy, your sexuality…anything. As long as it takes you away…” (U.S. students rank near the bottom of developed nations in math and science testing, despite having spent more money per pupil than any other nation. See Charlotte Iserbyt’s The Deliberate Dumbing Down of America)

Social Life – “Replace traditionally established institutions and organizations with fake organizations. Take away the initiative from people. Take away the responsibility from naturally established links between individuals, groups of individuals, and society at large, and replace them with artificially, bureaucratically controlled bodies…the main concern of social workers is not your family, not you, not social relations between groups of people. The main concern is to get their paycheck from the government. What will be the result of their social work doesn’t really matter.” (i.e Replacing individual accountability with bureaucratic bodies that are not held accountable, …this is the Soviet council form of government.)

Media – “Who elected them? How come they have almost monopolistic power over your mind? They can rape your mind. But how come they have the nerve to decide what is good and what is bad for the ELECTED - by you – president and his administration. Who the hell are they? Spiro Agnew, who was hated by the liberal left, called them ‘a bunch of enfeebled snobs,’ and that’s exactly what they are. They think they know. They don’t.”

Feminism – “I don’t know how you feel about feminism. I don’t think that to be equal with men you have to politicize your movement. You cannot legislate equality; you have to BE equal. But that distracts your mind from real issues: family, loyalty, and moral foundations.”

In a nut shell, this process destroys, weakens, or simply replaces any existing organizations and institutions that work for the nation’s own interests. Sane individuals with a sense of history understand that people in power cannot be trusted, hence the checks, balances, limitations and unalienable individual rights provided by our Constitution. A belief in Marxist-Leninist ideology (state tyranny) requires a child-like hope for benevolent dictators that care about the interests of everyone. History shows that these are disposable mouthpieces of world government.

Co-founder of the World Federation for Mental Health and friend of UN Charter author and Soviet spy Alger Hiss, Dr. Brock Chisholm, nailed it when he said, “To achieve world government, it is necessary to remove from the minds of men their individualism, loyalty to family traditions, and religious dogmas…”

If We Had A Choice

Bezmenov concluded his lecture with a powerful message. The answer to subversion is “bringing society back to religion. Something that you cannot touch and eat and put on yourself. But something that rules society and makes it move, and preserves it.”

This all relates to a great lie about religion that has been carefully instilled in most: that some individuals need religion. They’ve got it backwards. Societies NEED religion more than individuals do. If there is not a single, unifying philosophy that all men are under together, then men (or perhaps the spirits they worship) will rule as they see fit. If this is true, and I believe it is, how could the Creator (if he exists) prove his existence and mankind’s purpose in a more effective way? History seems to prove we have a choice: be ruled by the laws of God, or subject to the claws of Man.

Y.B. lecture of the process of ideological subversion Part 1: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JN0By0xbst8

Popularity: 7% [?]

Sphere: Related Content

Norway Pays Bitter Price for Mass Third World Immigration

Wednesday, January 27th, 2010

BNP News Team

All 21 reported cases of rape with aggravated assault — the highest number since records were started — in the Norwegian capital of Oslo last year were committed by “non-Western immigrants” and 90 percent of all rape victims were Norwegian women, police have announced.

Oslo police spokesman Hanne Kristine Rohde defied the strictures of political correctness to release the figures in an interview on the national Norwegian broadcaster, NRK. She said she was aware that the “statistics are controversial.”

When she was asked by NRK if the police were not “stigmatising an entire community” by releasing the statistics, Ms Rohde said she “wants to contribute to a better and safe world. That’s why the truth needs to be told. I hope the debate will focus on that,” she told NRK.

According to the police figures, the number of rapes with violent assault committed in Oslo also doubled compared to 2008. According to the police statement, “in each and every case, not only in 2008 and 2009 but also in 2007, the offender was a non-Western immigrant. At the same time, in 9 out of 10 cases, the victim was Norwegian, not just by nationality, but also by ethnicity.”

The NRK report concluded that “not a single one of the offenders had a Western background. Four people have been arrested. In all other cases, the victims reported that the offenders either looked like non-Western immigrants, or they spoke a non-Western language. Not a single case has been connected to a Western man.”

According to official figures released in 2008, Third World immigration accounted for 25 percent of Oslo’s population. Data from the city and state statistics bureau shows that of Oslo’s 560,484 residents, 137,878 were immigrants.

The largest single immigrant group continues to be from Pakistan. Next in line is Somalia. Other countries with relatively large immigrant groups in Oslo include Sri Lanka, Iraq, Turkey, Vietnam and Iran.

In addition, an ever growing group of Third World immigrants is dependent on welfare. A study by Tyra Ekhaugen of the Frisch Centre for Economic Research and the University of Oslo concluded that immigration has increased the pressure on the welfare state, because many immigrants do not join the tax-paying part of the population.

Third World immigrants are, the study showed, recipients of social security benefits at a rate ten times that of native Norwegians — destroying the liberal argument used by pro-immigration politicians in Norway that immigration was necessary to maintain the social welfare state.

More than half of all social security benefits in the city of Oslo are spent on non-Western immigrants. Immigrants from Africa have the highest unemployment rate, with official figures in 2005 showing a black unemployment rate of 17.5 percent.

Immigrants from Asia had an unemployment rate of 12.3 percent, while those from South and Central America had an unemployment rate of 10.1 percent. The average unemployment rate amongst native Norwegians was 2.4 percent.

Article Source: BNP.org

Popularity: 9% [?]

Sphere: Related Content

Gridlock in Congress

Thursday, November 20th, 2008

By Ken Thomas

WASHINGTON (AP) – A plan to give troubled U.S. automakers billions of dollars in government-backed loans is on life support, leaving the fate of hundreds of thousands of workers and Detroit’s once-venerable car companies hanging in the balance.

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., canceled plans Wednesday for a vote on a bill to carve $25 billion in new auto industry loans out of the $700 billion Wall Street rescue fund. The Bush administration and congressional Republicans have rejected Democrats’ plan to dip into that pot of money.

Warning of economic disaster, a bipartisan group of senators from auto industry states are trying to reach a deal on an alternative package. If an agreement can be reached, Reid said, the Senate still could vote on it as part of a measure to extend jobless benefits.

But Reid acknowledged that was “not going to be easy.”

With all sides sensing doom for a Big Three automaker rescue, the finger-pointing began. White House press secretary Dana Perino said that if Congress “leaves for a two-month vacation without having addressed this important issue … then the Congress will bear responsibility for anything that happens.”

Congressional Democrats countered that the Treasury Department already had the power to grant emergency funds to the automakers, but the Bush administration opposed the approach.

The leaders of General Motors Corp. (GM), Ford Motor Co. (F) and Chrysler LLC painted a grim picture of their financial position during two days of congressional hearings, warning that the collapse of the auto industry could lead to the loss of 3 million jobs. Detroit’s automakers, hurt by a sharp drop in sales and a nearly frozen credit market, burned through nearly $18 billion in cash reserves during the last quarter, and GM and Chrysler both said they could collapse in weeks.

“I don’t believe we have the luxury of a lot of time,” GM CEO Rick Wagoner told a House hearing.

Alan Mulally, the CEO of Ford Motor Co., said the company had sufficient cash reserves to make it through 2009. But United Auto Workers union president Ron Gettelfinger said a bankruptcy could spawn others.

“If there’s a Chapter 11 (for) one of the companies, it will drag at least one other with them, if not all of them. And I do not believe Chapter 11 is where it will end. It will go to liquidation,” he said ominously.

Automakers ran into more resistance from House lawmakers, who chastised the executives for fighting tougher fuel-efficiency standards in the past and questioned their use of private jets while at the same time seeking government handouts.

“My fear is that you’re going to take this money and continue the same stupid decisions you’ve made for 25 years,” said Rep. Michael Capuano, D-Mass.

The stakes are high. The Detroit automakers employ nearly a quarter-million workers, and more than 730,000 other workers produce materials and parts that go into cars. About 1 million more people work in dealerships nationwide. If just one of the automakers declared bankruptcy, some estimates put U.S. job losses next year as high as 2.5 million.

The White House and congressional Republicans have called on Democrats to support a GOP plan to divert a $25 billion loan program created by Congress in September – designed to help the companies develop more fuel-efficient vehicles – to meet the auto giants’ immediate financial needs.

Sens. Carl Levin, D-Mich., Kit Bond. R-Mo., and George Voinovich, R-Ohio, are trying to broker an alternative that could provide bridge loans or a guarantee that the fuel-efficiency loan fund ultimately would be replenished. Negotiators were discussing a scaled-down aid package of $5 billion to $8 billion to help the automakers survive through year’s end.

But it was unclear whether any progress could be made. Democrats strongly oppose letting the car companies tap into the energy loans for short-term cash-flow needs.

Despite the gridlock in Congress, there could be a contingency plan: a return to Washington in December for another postelection session to try to strike a deal.

House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer, D-Md., noted that Democratic leaders were planning to gather for an economic conference the week of Dec. 8. “That is available,” Hoyer said. “The year has not ended.”

Popularity: 94% [?]

Sphere: Related Content