Part 1: Accelerating costs of jackpot or anchor babies on American taxpayers

Every year, 400,000 pregnant women enter the United States illegally to birth their babies on American soil. Their children become instant citizens and their mothers become instant wards of the American taxpayer. They enjoy taxpayer paid deliveries in our hospitals, unlimited medical health, K-12 educations, ‘free’ breakfasts and lunches, ‘free’ English as a second language classes and assisted housing, food stamps and social security benefits.

In an excellent expose’ by Mark Cromer, www.capsweb.org, senior writing fellow, titled: “American Jackpot: Remaking America by Birthright Citizenship”
(http://tinyurl.com/ya29za3), he explains phenomenon occurring only in the United States. No other country in the world allows it.

Only one U.S. House congressman named Nathan Deal (R-GA) has entered a bill, HR 1968 to stop this abuse of the 14th Amendment, but his bill has languished in committee for over 10 years: another instance where you Congress sits on its thumbs while you pay and pay.

Unfortunately, this ‘jackpot baby’ syndrome has continued for over 30 years and will continue until someone in Congress stops it.

“Indeed, the United States today stands virtually alone among power-house industrial democracies in granting unequivocal birth citizenship,” said Cromer. “The notion of being an instant American if born on United States soil has been so romanticized at critical junctures in our evolving popular culture it is now seen by many as a fundamental characteristic of the American identity.

“So there’s no small amount of irony in the fact that the policy of granting birthright citizenship in America has become a core gravitational ‘pull factor’ that has resulted in the largest sustained wave of mass human migration ever witnessed in the history of the nation-state; a human tsunami that has played a critical role in the rapid erosion of the quality of life that so many immigrants seek on these shores. It also increasingly poses a non-consensual makeover of the culture that American citizens had neither voice nor vote in unleashing.”

Dr. John C. Eastman, Dean of Chapman University’s law school in Orange, California, is a leading scholar in the nation on constitutional law and has testified before Congress on the issue of birthright citizenship. Eastman states that the framers of the 14th Amendment had no intention of allowing another country to wage demographic warfare against the U.S. and reshaping its culture by means of exploiting birthright citizenship. Eastman said, “We have this common understanding of when you come here to visit, that you are subject to our jurisdiction. You have to obey our traffic laws.

If you come here from England, you have to drive on the right side of the road and not on the left side of the road. But the framers of the 14th Amendment had in mind two different notions of ‘subject to the jurisdiction.’ There was what they called territorial jurisdiction- you have to follow the laws in the place where you are-but there was also this more complete, or allegiance-owing jurisdiction that held that you not only have to follow the laws, but that you owe allegiance to the sovereign.”

MASSIVE FINANCIAL AND CITIZENSHIP FRAUD

Anchor babies, upon birth in a U.S. hospital cost from $6,000.00 to as much as a $500,000.00 per birth depending on complications such as Down’s Syndrome, Autism, heart birth defects, etc. They also cost an average of $9,644.00 each year for their education and thousands more for English classes and breakfast and lunch programs.

“Dr. Edward J. Erler, a political science professor at Cal State San Bernardino, has spoken out against the political malaise and the popular misconception that has blossomed around the continued awarding of citizenship to virtually anyone born in the country,” said Cromer. “Echoing the sentiments of Eastman, Erler points out that the framers of the 14th Amendment sought to reassure the Congress in 1868 that the citizenship provisions did not cover-nor were they crafted with the intent to grant-citizenship to the children of foreign nationals born in the United States.”

“It’s difficult to fathom how those who defy American law can derive benefits for their children by their defiance; or that any sovereign nation would allow such a thing,” Erler said. “That it has been allowed to happen on such a massive scale and has even been encouraged by various groups gets Terry Anderson’s blood boiling. A life-long black resident of South Los Angeles, Anderson has used his talk radio show to decry not only the radical and rapid transformation of traditional black neighborhoods in Los Angeles and the erosion of the black power structure in the face of explosive immigration, but to blast the government’s policy of granting birthright citizenship to illegal immigrants, children by their defiance; or that any sovereign nation would allow such a thing.”

Cromer said, “Ticking off a list of impacts that illegal immigration has brought down on the black working class community-from increased competition for jobs to overcrowded classrooms where black students suffer under a bilingual curriculum-Anderson says illegal immigrants brazenly celebrate “hitting the jackpot” when they have a baby in America.”

“It’s wrong, it’s a misinterpretation and it angers me because that was written for my ancestors,” Anderson says. “And now it is being misused. They took an amendment made for us and turned it around against us.”

As a teacher, I watched the destruction of American classrooms in Denver, LA, Chicago, Detroit, Dallas and Miami. With over 50 different languages in major city schools, millions of fatherless children and no appreciation for or understanding of American educational standards and culture, those anchor babies slowly and today more speedily transform America into another country inside our own country. By 2042, Mexicans and their offspring will become the dominant ethnic group in America according to a recent PEW report.

As we pour over 240,000 legal and illegal immigrants into our country every 30 days, and allow this Jackpot Baby or Anchor Baby phenomenon to continue, American communities, schools and cities cannot, and will not enjoy a happy ending as our civilization balkanizes against itself on multiple levels. If you don’t think it’s happening, take a three day visit to Detroit or Los Angeles. Everyone is from some other country, few speak English, half of them can’t write their name in English and all of them are legal Americans.

For further information, visit and join www.capsweb.org for a sobering reality check of what is happening to our country.

© 2010 Frosty Wooldridge – All Rights Reserved

Bookmark to:

© gdbrede for DeadBeat Politicians, 2010. | Permalink | No comment

Add to del.icio.us

Search blogs linking this post with Technorati

Want more on these topics ? Browse the archive of posts filed under WhistleBlower Scandals.

By Toby Moreland

The Soviet Union was a front for the alliance between international bankers and the British Empire. Marxist-Leninist ideology is illegitimate to the core; it is a tool used in the process of “ideological subversion,” a method of weakening independent nations and ultimately turning them into socialist “democracies” under internationalist control.”

In a 1980’s interview with G. Edward Griffin, Yuri Bezmenov, KGB defector and expert in propaganda, said the subversion methods employed in the U.S. by the KGB were designed to “change the perception of reality of every American to such an extent that – despite the abundance of information – no one is able to come to sensible conclusions in the interest of defending themselves, their families, their community, and their country.”

This multi-stage process requires media complicity/mediocrity, control of educational policy, widespread corruption in politics and industry, and the unlimited money/credit of the international bankers who funded and controlled the USSR.

Scrupulous and influential opponents are discredited, threatened or murdered. It goes very slowly, and its purpose is to eventually bring the target nation to total collapse, when efficient shifts of power structure and economy can take place.

It is important to understand that the goal of ideological subversion is NOT to convert everyone to the left. Leftist ideology must only be presented as a legitimate alternative for the subversion to be successful. The Hegelian dialectic does the rest, and when the economic structure deteriorates within the target nation, the subverted population – divided, dumbed down, short-sighted and reactive – will beg for the expansion of government programs.

According to Bezmenov, the first stage of this process – demoralization – usually takes 15 to 20 years because this is the amount of time it takes to educate a single generation of students. In the United States, the super-patsy, this process has continued uninterrupted for at least 50 years. It has been applied in any area of society where public opinion is formulated.

Bezmenov said that about 80-85% of the KGB’s resources, money, and manpower went toward this subversion process. They recruited journalists, filmmakers, actors, musicians, activists, etc. He said many KGB agents were exchange students.

Here are a few examples of application from Bezmenov’s lecture in Los Angeles in 1983:

Religion – “Destroy it. Ridicule it. Replace it with various sex cults which bring people’s attention, faith – whether it is naive or primitive – it doesn’t really matter. As long as the basically accepted religious dogma is slowly eroded and people are divorced from the Supreme Being. Replace accepted, respected religious organizations with fake organizations. Distract people’s attention from the real faith, and attract them to various different faiths.” (without any unifying philosophy, important discussions are held exclusively in the realm of humanistic materialism, which clearly favors the central bankers and is always subject to change at their whim.)

Education – “Distract them from learning something which is constructive, pragmatic, efficient. Instead of mathematics, physics, foreign languages, chemistry…teach them history of urban warfare, natural foods, home economy, your sexuality…anything. As long as it takes you away…” (U.S. students rank near the bottom of developed nations in math and science testing, despite having spent more money per pupil than any other nation. See Charlotte Iserbyt’s The Deliberate Dumbing Down of America)

Social Life – “Replace traditionally established institutions and organizations with fake organizations. Take away the initiative from people. Take away the responsibility from naturally established links between individuals, groups of individuals, and society at large, and replace them with artificially, bureaucratically controlled bodies…the main concern of social workers is not your family, not you, not social relations between groups of people. The main concern is to get their paycheck from the government. What will be the result of their social work doesn’t really matter.” (i.e Replacing individual accountability with bureaucratic bodies that are not held accountable, …this is the Soviet council form of government.)

Media – “Who elected them? How come they have almost monopolistic power over your mind? They can rape your mind. But how come they have the nerve to decide what is good and what is bad for the ELECTED - by you – president and his administration. Who the hell are they? Spiro Agnew, who was hated by the liberal left, called them ‘a bunch of enfeebled snobs,’ and that’s exactly what they are. They think they know. They don’t.”

Feminism – “I don’t know how you feel about feminism. I don’t think that to be equal with men you have to politicize your movement. You cannot legislate equality; you have to BE equal. But that distracts your mind from real issues: family, loyalty, and moral foundations.”

In a nut shell, this process destroys, weakens, or simply replaces any existing organizations and institutions that work for the nation’s own interests. Sane individuals with a sense of history understand that people in power cannot be trusted, hence the checks, balances, limitations and unalienable individual rights provided by our Constitution. A belief in Marxist-Leninist ideology (state tyranny) requires a child-like hope for benevolent dictators that care about the interests of everyone. History shows that these are disposable mouthpieces of world government.

Co-founder of the World Federation for Mental Health and friend of UN Charter author and Soviet spy Alger Hiss, Dr. Brock Chisholm, nailed it when he said, “To achieve world government, it is necessary to remove from the minds of men their individualism, loyalty to family traditions, and religious dogmas…”

If We Had A Choice

Bezmenov concluded his lecture with a powerful message. The answer to subversion is “bringing society back to religion. Something that you cannot touch and eat and put on yourself. But something that rules society and makes it move, and preserves it.”

This all relates to a great lie about religion that has been carefully instilled in most: that some individuals need religion. They’ve got it backwards. Societies NEED religion more than individuals do. If there is not a single, unifying philosophy that all men are under together, then men (or perhaps the spirits they worship) will rule as they see fit. If this is true, and I believe it is, how could the Creator (if he exists) prove his existence and mankind’s purpose in a more effective way? History seems to prove we have a choice: be ruled by the laws of God, or subject to the claws of Man.

Y.B. lecture of the process of ideological subversion Part 1: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JN0By0xbst8

Bookmark to:

© gdbrede for DeadBeat Politicians, 2010. | Permalink | No comment

Add to del.icio.us

Search blogs linking this post with Technorati

Want more on these topics ? Browse the archive of posts filed under Nutjobs.

BNP News Team

All 21 reported cases of rape with aggravated assault — the highest number since records were started — in the Norwegian capital of Oslo last year were committed by “non-Western immigrants” and 90 percent of all rape victims were Norwegian women, police have announced.

Oslo police spokesman Hanne Kristine Rohde defied the strictures of political correctness to release the figures in an interview on the national Norwegian broadcaster, NRK. She said she was aware that the “statistics are controversial.”

When she was asked by NRK if the police were not “stigmatising an entire community” by releasing the statistics, Ms Rohde said she “wants to contribute to a better and safe world. That’s why the truth needs to be told. I hope the debate will focus on that,” she told NRK.

According to the police figures, the number of rapes with violent assault committed in Oslo also doubled compared to 2008. According to the police statement, “in each and every case, not only in 2008 and 2009 but also in 2007, the offender was a non-Western immigrant. At the same time, in 9 out of 10 cases, the victim was Norwegian, not just by nationality, but also by ethnicity.”

The NRK report concluded that “not a single one of the offenders had a Western background. Four people have been arrested. In all other cases, the victims reported that the offenders either looked like non-Western immigrants, or they spoke a non-Western language. Not a single case has been connected to a Western man.”

According to official figures released in 2008, Third World immigration accounted for 25 percent of Oslo’s population. Data from the city and state statistics bureau shows that of Oslo’s 560,484 residents, 137,878 were immigrants.

The largest single immigrant group continues to be from Pakistan. Next in line is Somalia. Other countries with relatively large immigrant groups in Oslo include Sri Lanka, Iraq, Turkey, Vietnam and Iran.

In addition, an ever growing group of Third World immigrants is dependent on welfare. A study by Tyra Ekhaugen of the Frisch Centre for Economic Research and the University of Oslo concluded that immigration has increased the pressure on the welfare state, because many immigrants do not join the tax-paying part of the population.

Third World immigrants are, the study showed, recipients of social security benefits at a rate ten times that of native Norwegians — destroying the liberal argument used by pro-immigration politicians in Norway that immigration was necessary to maintain the social welfare state.

More than half of all social security benefits in the city of Oslo are spent on non-Western immigrants. Immigrants from Africa have the highest unemployment rate, with official figures in 2005 showing a black unemployment rate of 17.5 percent.

Immigrants from Asia had an unemployment rate of 12.3 percent, while those from South and Central America had an unemployment rate of 10.1 percent. The average unemployment rate amongst native Norwegians was 2.4 percent.

Article Source: BNP.org

Bookmark to:

© gdbrede for DeadBeat Politicians, 2010. | Permalink | No comment

Add to del.icio.us

Search blogs linking this post with Technorati

Want more on these topics ? Browse the archive of posts filed under Nutjobs.

I was watching the Scott Brown acceptance speach, during the speach, Scott mentioned he had to beat the Mass. political machine, as a person who has run against the two party political machines, it is tough, so just what is the machine?

The poltical machine could be described as big brother on steroids, it all starts on the federal level with the head of each political party, the president on down to the precinct level, you have someone in charge on a national level who is in charge of state leaders of their party, who then is in charge of county leaders, who are in charge of city leaders, who are in charge of the small precincts, it is a top down organization, not what is sometimes referred to as a grassroots org.

When you think of it is sort like the hitler youth core for each party, they will do and say anything to discredit their opponents, the whisper campaigns, the fund raising, when you have a machine set up like they do, it is very tough to have an independent win against it.

Bookmark to:

© gdbrede for DeadBeat Politicians, 2010. | Permalink | No comment

Add to del.icio.us

Search blogs linking this post with Technorati

Want more on these topics ? Browse the archive of posts filed under Joe Six Pack.

Google’s clash with China is about much more than the fate of a single, powerful firm. The company’s decision to pull out of China, unless the government there changes its policies on censorship, is a harbinger of increasingly stormy relations between the US and China.

The reason that the Google case is so significant is because it suggests that the assumptions on which US policy to China have been based since the Tiananmen massacre of 1989 could be plain wrong. The US has accepted – even welcomed – China’s emergence as a giant economic power because American policymakers convinced themselves that economic opening would lead to political liberalisation in China.

GIDEON RACHMAN’S BLOG:

Read the FT’s international affairs columnist’s authoritative and lively commentary throughout the week

If that assumption changes, American policy towards China could change with it. Welcoming the rise of a giant Asian economy that is also turning into a liberal democracy is one thing. Sponsoring the rise of a Leninist one-party state, that is America’s only plausible geopolitical rival, is a different proposition. Combine this political disillusionment with double-digit unemployment in the US that is widely blamed on Chinese currency manipulation, and you have the formula for an anti-China backlash.

Both Bill Clinton and George W. Bush firmly believed that free trade and, in particular, the information age would make political change in China irresistible. On a visit to China in 1998, Mr Clinton proclaimed: “In this global information age, when economic success is built on ideas, personal freedom is essential to the greatness of any nation.” A year later, Mr Bush made a similar point: “Economic freedom creates habits of liberty. And habits of liberty create expectations of democracy … Trade freely with the Chinese and time is on our side.”

The two presidents were reflecting the conventional wisdom among America’s most influential pundits. Tom Friedman, New York Times columnist and author of best-selling books on globalisation, once proclaimed bluntly: “China’s going to have a free press. Globalisation will drive it.” Robert Wright, one of Mr Clinton’s favourite thinkers, argued that if China chose to block free access to the internet, “the price would be dismal economic failure”.

So far, the facts are refusing to conform to the theory. China has continued to censor new and old media, but this has hardly condemned it to “dismal economic failure”. On the contrary, China is now the world’s second largest economy and its largest exporter, with foreign reserves above $2,000bn. But all this economic growth shows little sign of provoking the political changes anticipated by Bush and Clinton. If anything, the Chinese government seems to be getting more repressive. Liu Xiaobo, a leading Chinese dissident, was recently sentenced to 11 years in prison for his involvement in the Charter 08 movement that advocates democratic reforms.

Google’s decision to confront the Chinese government is an early sign that the Americans are getting fed up with dealing with Chinese authoritarianism. But the biggest pressures are likely to come from politicians rather than businessmen. Google is an unusual company in an unusually politicised industry. If the Googlers do indeed head for the exits in China, they are unlikely to be crushed by a stampede of other multinationals rushing to follow them. To most big companies the country’s market is too large and tempting to ignore. Despite Google, US business is likely to remain the lobby that argues hardest for continuing engagement with China.

The pressures for disengagement will come from labour activists, security hawks and politicians – particularly in Congress. To date, the Obama administration has based its policy firmly on the assumptions that have governed America’s approach to China for a generation. The president’s recent set-piece speech on Asia was a classic statement of the case for US engagement with China – complete with the ritualistic assertion that America welcomes China’s rise. But, after being censored by Chinese television in Shanghai and harangued by a junior Chinese official at the Copenhagen climate talks, Barack Obama may be feeling less warm towards Beijing. An early sign that the White House is hardening its policy could come in the next few months, with an official decision to label China a “currency manipulator”.

Even if the administration itself does not move, the voices calling for tougher policies against China are likely to get louder in Congress. Google’s decision to highlight the dangers of cyberattack from China will play to growing American security fears about China. The development of Chinese missile systems that threaten US naval dominance in the Pacific are also causing concern in Washington. Impending US arms sales to Taiwan are already provoking a dispute.

Meanwhile, protectionism seems to be becoming intellectually respectable in the US in ways that should worry China.

A trade war between America and China is hardly to be welcomed. It could tip the world back into recession and inject dangerous new tensions into international politics. If it happens, both sides will share the blame. The US has been almost wilfully naive about the connections between free trade and democracy. The Chinese have been provocative over currency and human rights. If they want to head off a damaging clash with America, changes in policy would be well advised.

gideon.rachman@ft.com
More columns at www.ft.com/rachman
Post and read comments at Gideon Rachman’s blog

Bookmark to:

© gdbrede for DeadBeat Politicians, 2010. | Permalink | No comment

Add to del.icio.us

Search blogs linking this post with Technorati

Want more on these topics ? Browse the archive of posts filed under Conspiracy Theories.

The politicians are going about the health care issue completly the wrong way ( of course ) They are trying to fix it by getting the government to involved, the real problem is, bringing the doctors and hospitals price of services down, why does it cost $5.00 for an asprin, $20.00 for a pair of paper slippers, $200.00 for a doctors visit, $3000.00 for a colonoscopy and on and on

If the hospitals would have normal mark ups, the insurance companies would pay less, and in turn charge people lower insurance rates, CASE SOLVED

Bookmark to:

© gdbrede for DeadBeat Politicians, 2009. | Permalink | No comment

Add to del.icio.us

Search blogs linking this post with Technorati

Want more on these topics ? Browse the archive of posts filed under Deadbeats.

Angie Harmon is not afraid to come out and say she doesn’t like how President Obama is handling the job — but she’s sick of having to defend herself from being deemed a racist.

“Here’s my problem with this, I’m just going to come out and say it. If I have anything to say against Obama it’s not because I’m a racist, it’s because I don’t like what he’s doing as President and anybody should be able to feel that way, but what I find now is that if you say anything against him you’re called a racist,” Harmon told Tarts at Thursday’s Los Angeles launch of the new eyelash-growing formula, Latisse. “But it has nothing to do with it, I don’t care what color he is. I’m just not crazy about what he’s doing and I heard all about this, and he’s gonna do that and change and change, so okay … I’m still dressing for a recession over here buddy and we’ve got unemployment at an all-time high and that was his number one thing and that’s the thing I really don’t appreciate. If I’m going to disagree with my President, that doesn’t make me a racist. If I was to disagree with W, that doesn’t make me racist. It has nothing to do with it, it is ridiculous.”

Speaking of dislikes, the starlet has also had enough of the double-standards in the media.

“I do think McCain would have done a better job, only because I think he has more experience. I also think if W or John McCain or Reagan would have gone and done a talk show, the backlash would have been so huge and in his face, and ‘What is our president doing? How unclassy!’ But Obama does it and no one says anything,” Harmon said.

And in spite of the scornful opinions most of her Tinseltown counterparts have shared on Gov. Sarah Palin, Harmon remains a true fan.

“I admire any kind of woman like her. My whole motto is to know what I stand for and know what I don’t stand for and have the courage to live my life accordingly and she does exactly that. The fact that this woman has made the decisions she’s made and literally lived her life according to that and takes heat for it is absolutely disgusting to me,” she added. “People cannot look at this woman. I really think they’re afraid of her and her morals, ethics and values and the fact that she hangs on them. Is she the most experienced person in the world? But she was running to be the Vice President, so we then put the most inexperienced person as the President. That didn’t make any sense to me.”

However Harmon is definitely in the Hollywood minority when it comes to her criticism of Obama as other lasses at the Latisse party were quick to advocate their unequivocal support.

“The sort of criticism over the last couple of weeks is a bit unfounded, he’s been in office for barely any time and I think he inherited a lot on his plate and he’s doing a pretty remarkable job,” quipped Mandy Moore. “I think it’s cool that he went on Leno and I watched the “60 minutes” interview as well last week. The guy is just so articulate and he is so well versed in something that is so new to him and I think he has a good team around him. It sounds cliché, but he makes me feel proud to be an American.”

Debra Messing also told Tarts that our new President is not only meeting her expectations, but going far beyond.

“He is thoughtful and considerate and he gets all the information before he speaks which I think is a wonderful quality for the ruler of the free world to have,” she explained.

The ladies of “Entourage” certainly showed their Obama-loyalty too.

“It’s not an over night process. It’s going to get worse before it gets better; we’re all kind of in the same boat now. Everybody’s broke and everybody’s struggling and he makes me feel like I know him and that I know Michelle and that they’re like us and they’re out to try to save the USA. It’s just an amazing period to watch him take on these challenges and everyday in the news to hear about AIG or possibly global currency changing, it’s incredible. He’s facing big challenges and he’s got a lot of support and I’m just praying things get better,” Debi Mazar said, while co-star Perrey Reeves added that Obama is a “wonderful leader” and she’s looking forward to his future endeavors.

Bookmark to:

© gdbrede for DeadBeat Politicians, 2009. | Permalink | No comment

Add to del.icio.us

Search blogs linking this post with Technorati

Want more on these topics ? Browse the archive of posts filed under Red--Republicans.

In the last few days I have seen the now famous video of Senator Pelosi, Speaking to a group of illegal aliens,

I have never been so disgusted at a politician as I am every time I see that video, can you believe a US Senator is saying this garbage, It is the most egregious pandering to an ethnic group I have ever seen.

In my mind, Nancy Pelosi and the Ilk like her should be tried for treason, and kicked out of office immediatly.

I am also nominating Nancy Pelosi as DEADBEAT POLITICIAN of the month.

Bookmark to:

© gdbrede for DeadBeat Politicians, 2009. | Permalink | No comment

Add to del.icio.us

Search blogs linking this post with Technorati

Want more on these topics ? Browse the archive of posts filed under Deadbeats.

So you looked in the mirror and you saw you were not to blame. You looked at the TV screen and saw the faces of the culprits. You studied the internet, you listened to talk radio shows and heard the outraged hosts cast blame and name names. You read the newspaper editorials and you knew, or thought you knew, who and what caused the global crash, and you knew it might get worse.

You knew it wasn’t you, who wrecked the world economy. You knew it was someone without any scruples. You knew, or thought you knew, that the culprits must have skipped high school Civics class, or failed Ethics or World Religion in college or plagiarized their class assignments and cheated on their tests.

Mostly you knew YOU were not to blame. How could you be to blame, with your crummy little job? Besides, you always did your civic duty and voted in most elections. At least the elections that really meant something, the national elections and mid-term elections, when you felt smug and superior for voting for either the smoothest Democrat or Republican candidate.

You knew, in your heart of hearts, that gangsta rap and violent video games and strip clubs wrecked the world economy. How did you know this? Because highly paid talk radio hosts and local politicians and presidential candidates all said they did. You also knew that steroid-abusing, spoiled, overpaid sports stars wrecked the world economy. How did you know this? Because highly paid sportswriters and talk show hosts said they did. When they told you this, on those endless TV sports shows, you nearly tore up your season tickets in a fit of justified anger.

You knew that silicon-breasted models, like Pam Anderson and her PETA gang, wrecked the world economy. You knew that PETA and Greenpeace were far worse that the PATRIOT Act, because self-righteous talk radio hosts told you they were and you believed them.

You knew that Conspiracy Theorists wrecked the global economy. How? Because they eroded faith in public officials. Not that these public servants weren’t beyond scrutiny but by wasting valuable time, discussing wacky ideas instead of contributing to the economy, these conspiracy theorists left America vulnerable to the next attack, which they endlessly predicted. You knew these sick people, sicker than gangsta rappers or spoiled sports stars, wanted the economy to fail. Why? Because they needed to fulfill some dark, pessimistic yearning or they had all invested in gold.

You looked in the mirror and you knew that religious nuts wrecked the economy. The ones who wanted to home school their kids.

You knew that gun nuts had wrecked the world economy. Why? Because they mistrusted the government for some reason, and kept mentioning Oklahoma City or Waco or Ruby Ridge or Randy Weaver, people and places you had never heard of before.

You knew that unions had wrecked the world economy. Why? Because union workers wanted better paying jobs and health insurance. These greedy bastards wanted a wage that was only 50-100 times smaller than the CEOs, instead of 500-1000 times smaller. You knew that all the jobs in America and Europe went overseas because of union demands and those greedy union officials, and thus these leeches helped wreck the world economy. How did you know this? Because highly paid talk radio hosts and wealthy elected officials said they did.

You knew that illegal immigrants wrecked the world economy. You saw them standing there by the road every day, silently wrecking the economy in their shabby clothes. You knew that somehow they snuck into the country, somehow bypassed the airport where the PATRIOT Act was enforced in full swing, and slowly wrecked the entire world economy with their sly offer to do all the dirty work. You just knew they were to blame. How? Because highly paid talk radio hosts and politicians told you they were.

You knew that greedy homebuyers were to blame. They wheedled those honest bankers out of all that hard-earned money, and bought houses they couldn’t afford. For years these scammers had clicked on those flashy internet links that promised them $500,000 houses for $500 down. Then they took the money offered by Freddie & Fannie & IndyMac & Wamu and bought houses they hoped to flip because they watched that reality show, Flip This or That Old House, and conspired to wreck the world economy.

You knew that Libertarians, Anarchists, Independents and so-called Constitutionalists and all these other third party candidates had wrecked the world economy. You just knew it! You knew these wacky people were always the ones calling for increased accountability rather than trust in the Two Party system. And, thankfully, you knew that you had never handed them your hard-earned dollars, your sacred vote or heeded their wacky warnings.

These noisy rabble rousers always claimed that the Two Party system protected the ruling elites, protected bankers and Wall Street speculators from oversight or scrutiny, protected top intelligence chiefs and professional politicians and their lobbyists, protected Pentagon toymakers and corporate dons and ultra-secret societies, protected them all from too much scrutiny.

Of course, Thank God, the highly paid talk radio and TV hosts and Op-Ed columnists of the US mainstream media always lampooned these moralistic cretins. They belittled and taunted these nut cases with their wide-eyed messages that the entire ruling elite was somehow suspect. But this coalition of troublemakers, including people like Ron Paul, Ralph Nader, Cynthia McKinney, Dennis Kucinch, Bob Bowman, Uri Avnery, Dahr Jamail, Naomi Wolf, Wayne Madsen, Steve Lendman, Norman Finkelstein, Devy Kidd, Robert Fisk, Noam Chomski, Rob Moody, Jeff Rense, Alex Cockburn, Paul Craig Roberts, Michael Moore, Murray Rothbard, Sherman Skolnick, Jon Gold, Aidan Monaghan, Alex Jones and thousands of others just like them and their spawn, swayed enough believers.

And pretty soon, wouldn’t you know it, the entire world economy was wrecked.

Along with dozens of other fine Internet writers, longtime gadfly and history buff, Douglas Herman correctly predicted the meltdown of the US economy with columns like “Money—Funny, Scary, Paper Money” (Google), years before Gerald Celente or Nouriel Roubini. He lives in Bullhead City, Arizona and frequents douglasherman7@yahoo.com

Bookmark to:

© gdbrede for DeadBeat Politicians, 2009. | Permalink | No comment

Add to del.icio.us

Search blogs linking this post with Technorati

Want more on these topics ? Browse the archive of posts filed under WhistleBlower Scandals.

PRESIDENT-elect Barack Obama is being hit by shocking charges – it’s against the law for him to take office because he isn’t a “natural-born” U.S. citizen! A stunning lawsuit by a former government official claims the 47-year-old politician was actually born in Kenya, which would disqualify him from office. GLOBE’s Special Report rips the lid off the simmering controversy. It’s must reading for every American!

Bookmark to:

© gdbrede for DeadBeat Politicians, 2009. | Permalink | No comment

Add to del.icio.us

Search blogs linking this post with Technorati

Want more on these topics ? Browse the archive of posts filed under Conspiracy Theories.